|
The Pentateuch:
Authorship and the Documentary Hypothesis
Preliminary:
Anonymous works.
Tradition of Moses writing.
1) in Pentateuch. Exod. 17.14; 24.4; 34.27; Deut. 32.22; Num. 33.2, Israelite
travel narr.; his song, Dt. 31.22 & ch. 32. The very fact that Moses
is said to write some things--but does not claim authorship for an entire
book or Pent.--may suggest a later hand writing about him & using his
works.
2) Preexilic historical books. Josh. 8.30-35; 23.6 (both refer to
"the book of the law of Moses"); 1 Kings 2.3 (=Dt 17.18-20; 29.9);
2 Kings 14.6 (=Dt 24.16); 18.6; 21.8; 23.25.
3) Prophetic literature. Daniel 9.11-13; Malachi 4.4
There are, in addition to the above, other references to Moses, his
calling and prophetic work (e.g. 1 Sam 12.6-8; Isa. 63.11-14; Jer. 15.1;
Micah 6.4-5).
The Documentary Hypothesis--History
Jean Astruc (1753): first proposed that parts of
Genesis came from two different authors, who each used a different divine
name (YHWH and Elohim)
Julius Wellhausen, Wellhausen, Die Komposition des
Hexateuchs, 1867-77.
J = Jehovah / YHWH, the "Yahwist source" (Wellhausen: ca.
850 B.C., Southern)
E = Elohim, the "Elohist source" (Wellhausen: ca. 750 B.C.,
Northern)
D = Deuteronomy (Wellhausen: ca. 621 BC, under Josiah; added by another
editor to JE ca. 550 BC)
P = Priestly code (Wellhausen: originated 500-450 BC, added to JED
ca. 400 BC)
Evidence For the Documentary Hypothesis:
Variable use of divine name
(Yahweh/Elohim). "even though these names often
occur without any discernible reason for using a particular name, a number
of chapters, or sections of chapters, especially in Genesis, use exclusively
or predominately one name or the other and a correlation can be seen between
the name chosen and the theological concepts and literary characteristics
of the passages"
Narrative is interspersed with blocks of legal material.
Doublets: 2 Decalogues,
Ex. 20 & Dt. 5. Abraham risks Sarah 2x calling sister, Gen. 12.10-16
& 10.1-7. Beersheba marks a covenant, (21.22-31; 26.26-33)
Comments, editorial or other, suggesting later era:
Deut. 3.13-14 ("so that to this day Bashan
is called Havvoth Jair); 34.6 ("to this day no one knows where his
grave is").
Gen. 36.31, "these were the kings who reigned in
Edom before any Israelite king reigned". !!
Ancient sites re-named: Gen.
14.14 (Dan); Deut. 34.1 (Dan); Gen. 13.18; 23.2 (Hebron).
Sources cited: "the
book of the generations of Adam", Gen. 5.1; "the book of the
wars of the Lord" (Num. 21.14); "the book of the covenant"
(Ex. 24.7; 2 Kgs 23.2); "the book of Jashar" (Josh. 10.13; 2Sam.
1.18).
Hebrew. evidence of late Hebrew in Pentateuch.
Differences in syntx, style, vocabulary between different sections of Pentateuch
(e.g. Leviticus vs. Deuteronomy)
Wellhausen's conclusion: the Law came late,
built the idea of covenant-law upon later prophets.
Evidence Against the Traditional Documentary
Hypothesis:
Precise extent/boundaries of
sources: no agreement among scholars.
Hebrew: arguments for
dating can be notoriously circular, unless supported by inscriptional or
other evidence which can be securely dated.
Ancient scribal techniques,
known from Egypt: updating language and place names as documents are copied.
Names of God. Harrison
compares to Quran suras using distinct names of God. Common for gods at
Ugarit to have compound (multiple?) names (Harrison: 517, 519).
Moses & writing.
Contrary to some opinions in 19th century (incl. Wellhausen), we now know
the Egyptians and peoples of Mesopotamia were extremely literate from a
time long before Moses.
Plurality of literary styles
used by a single author are also attested in Egypt (poetry & prose)
Covenant concept used by prophets.
Their work presupposes a normative law of God which Israel ought to know,
but has violated. Divine law and covenant must exist some time prior to
these writing prophets.
Hosea (ca. 740-722 B.C.) 12.9 (= Ex. 20.2); 12.13; 4.6 ("law of your
God"); 8.1 ("the people have broken my covenant and rebelled
against my law").
Isaiah (ca. 740-700 B.C.) 24.5 ("The earth is defiled by its people;
they have disobeyed the laws, violated the statutes and broken the everlasting
covenant"); 54.10; 55.3 (referring to a renewal of covenant; also
59.21; 61.8); 56.4, 6 (reference to the Sabbath command as part of God's
covenant). Law: 1.10; 2.3; 5.24-25; 8.16, 19-20; 30.9; 42.21, 24-25.
Jeremiah (ca. 626-586 B.C.) 3.16 ("the ark of the covenant of the
Lord"); 11.1-5, 10; 14.21; 22.9; 31.31-34 (a new covenant, implying
an old one); 33.19-22? Law: 2.8; 6.19; 8.8; 9.13; 16.11; 26.4; 32.20-31
(exodus, law); 44.10, 23.
Also Amos 2.4; Micah 4.2; Malachi 4.4.
The Temple. Dating
of sources post-monarchy, in era after building of temple: no mention of
a fixed temple or place of worship; no mention of Jerusalem or glorification
of a national capital.
Date of editing not = date of
original composition; date of compilation not = date of original
sources for narrative or law. What, where, when did contents of these sources
originate? Example of modern history book.
Patriarchal narratives echo
what archaeologists have discovered of the culture of early second millenium
B.C. West Semitic names; Abraham's journey fits conditions of Middle Bronze
II era; nomadic lifestyle; social & legal customs (wives, concubines,
purchase of land); religion.
Exodus & Conquest.
memory of city of "Rameses" (only so called from 13th to 11th
c. B.C.); semitic slaves in Egypt; evidence of invasion, destructions of
cities, new settlements in Palestine from late 13th c. to 12th c. B.C.
The tradition of Ezra as a "scribe
trained in the Law of Moses" puts an upper limit on the finishing
of the collection (Ezra 7; Nehemiah 8.1-8; tradition of Babylonian Talmud).
Ezra may have had a hand in the preservation and final editing of the text.
Missing the forest: search
for sources tends to diminish appreciation for final form of books as we
have them.
|